How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives

For Christmas I received an interesting present from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of easy triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and very funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, since rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, forum.batman.gainedge.org created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to widen his range, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative purposes ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's build it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest carrying out industries on the vague guarantee of development."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national data library containing public data from a vast array of sources will also be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and trademarketclassifieds.com used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts because it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are better.