The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.

No, they weren't personally in participation, but the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial websites offering both free casino-style games and lucrative prizes, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of lots of gaming corporations, not to discuss suit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as traditional gambling establishments, only without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income last year alone. Now the company deals with allegations of prohibited gambling in a New york city claim that declares VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'create a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's declaration below)

'I'm not sure" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebs from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any differences between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many - but not all - games are totally free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he frequently touts on social media

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social element of the casinos, while leaving out the capacity for actual gambling losses.

Others lure customers with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and estates before rotating to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' check out the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever gave up.'

The inconsistency between gambling websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.

A representative for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for complimentary.

'Most social sweeps clients never purchase,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online sports betting sites.'

Social gambling establishments offer consumers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with pals. Players have the choice to purchase worthless currency often referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be utilized to unlock various features within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling consumers to obtain other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's vehicles, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all but seven states, which has helped to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need normally require recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit consumers to send mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, players are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for registering, consequently providing them a factor to try their hands at any variety of gambling establishment games for a chance to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a method of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are merely a type of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to spend for a chance to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital distinction between social sweeps and standard online gambling websites like gambling establishments.'

Consider the way that McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that use them the opportunity to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself doesn't meet the definition of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring technique for promoting all kinds of daily organizations in the United States, everything from burgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many sports betting market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, consequently suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last permanently and they're usually not connected to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the attributes frequently associated with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use" casino-like" payments, usually 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payment portion for a momentary advertising sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the income made by the company [generally less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, providing consumers the chance to play casino-style video games for real prizes. Many of those brick-and-mortar facilities have because been shuttered over accusations of prohibited gaming.

DJ Khaled is among numerous celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos ought to face similar scrutiny.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually consistently been cited by courts and state attorney generals as crucial elements in determining that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for unlawful gambling.'

One of the gambling establishment industry's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact brand-new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being deprived of protections and states are giving up substantial tax and profits opportunities as this gaming replaces that performed through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current lawsuit, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful sports betting enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as offenders in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's request for comment.

'We generally don't discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games across most of North America, as we have for more than a decade, producing not just fantastic games, user experiences and entertainment, but also ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to intensely defend any claim which may be brought against us.'

The issues between conventional online gambling and sweepstakes casinos might show problematic for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong position versus illegal gaming - especially when trying to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time restriction from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting apparently illegal gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers' agents responded to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also neglected to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to describe to consumers the distinctions and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our business practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'A few of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious prohibited gambling websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at danger as well as courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with unlawful sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton